There is nothing wrong in this, i think this is one of the good ways, i support this method, in fact we practice traditional farming which is similar to this[but much older practice]. If you refer this thread [farmnest.com/forum/natural-farming-organic-farming/is-organic-farming-natural-farming-practical/], sustainability and scalability is discussed upto certain extent.
My grievance is on the projected figures, i think by giving these figures we are misguiding the wannabe farmers. I feel these looks like a marketing gimmick, whereas we need to be talking about actual numbers rather than potential numbers. This reminds me of mileage runs conducted by automobile companies, in those runs, even Bolero gives you 38 kmpl whereas actual running mileage is in the range of 8-9kmpl, would we want anyone to make buying decision on that?. Buying decision is made on its actual running mileage, and this is good for lots an lots of people. Even Palekar method is very good, practicing farmers are really benifitted by it.
Don’t you think we could get district wise data on these corps in relevant departments? Anything nearing the average (+ or -), would be good data for us to compare. Without the hassles of chemical farming this would amounts to better comparative income.